Who Wore It Best: Floral Nipple Covers

Filed under: Who Wore It Best

lindsay-britney.jpg

LEFT:  Lindsay Lohan as Marilyn Monroe (or so they say) for New York Magazine

RIGHT:  Britney Spears as Completely Sane Popstar for tabloid fodder


Posted by Candy ♦ February 18, 2008

Leave a Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post

Subscribe without commenting

Comments

21 Responses to “Who Wore It Best: Floral Nipple Covers”

  1. Britney hands down. Even crazy train looks better than firecrotch. How dare she compare herself to MM. She should do a fold as an old vegas socialite.

  2. Stellar

    Umm..yes. Those pictures of Lohan were very fugly. Crazy is usually always better than fugly.

  3. Jenn

    My thoughts exactly Stellar - crazy Britney beats blah Lindsey. No contest!!

  4. Lohan looks like a prop. her eyes are blank, and she looks posed in every shot. They should’ve used Charlize Theron.

  5. Bee Hind

    They both make my eyes bleed.

  6. martini lover

    britney for the win.

    i can’t believe i just wrote that.

  7. Gross.

  8. kathleen

    lapuke is the loser.

  9. Lindsay certainly does have a better rack. Is NY Magazine the best she could do?

  10. Annie

    That wig! Geeze. It looks like it came from the corner store. They had to be laughing at her behind the camera.

  11. Umm… none of the above!?

  12. Julie

    The stems those poor poor flowers came off of.

  13. Lulu

    PLease don’t buy that magazine. Give the money to the poor or invest it in something that is really going to give you any kind of pleasure.

  14. Happy Go Lucky

    I can’t believe it, but i’m voting Brit. Lindsey’s hair and false eyelashes look horrible. Plus i didn’t know MM had freckles
    all over her chest and arms.

  15. Rita

    Carrots wearing wigs and fake eyelashes? WEIRD!!!

  16. It's British Bitch

    I’d rather see Carrot Top’s flower-bedecked moobs than see that Firecrotch atrocity. Britney’s pic is candid and quite sweet so to my surprise I’m going to vote for her. This may be because Northern European’s think nothing of getting their jugs out on the beach in the summer, I was quite miffed when I realised that women don’t get them out here (unless it’s the Superbowl and you have some weird ass thing Jerome made in shop class 20 years ago clipped on it).

  17. Bee Hind

    I dunno, Brit Brit’s picture looks like it was taken by Tornado Bait Photography.

  18. UGh. How tragic is it when a 43-year old woman was hotter than a 24 year old freckled gal with saggy tits. Monroe was hot, Lohan unfortunately is NOT.
    My 37-year-old tits don’t hang down like Lohans.

  19. Jenn F.

    I agree with Javelin. Charlize Theron would have pulled off the pictures with more realism and grace. LL is making it impossible for anyone to take her seriously as anything other than a high-priced coke-snorting strumpet. With no movies or “albums” on the horizon, she resorts to this to keep herself in the headlines. And I thought her boobs looked better before I saw them naked. Geeeesh. I also can’t understand why they didn’t airbrush out the freckles.

    Britney wins this hands down. Because she’s completely fucking looney and at least that makes us smile. I’m curious though… does anyone else notice that Britney’s boobs have grown rather significantly within the last six months or so? Rather than a boob job, I suspect she just had some excess lypo’d off every other area and left the girls with the new gain.

  20. Ritinha

    British Bitch where is England? Perhaps in the United States? You should change your nickname. In Northern Europe we haven’t got Superbowl.Where were you exactly in northern Europe: Finland, Iceland? Perhaps when you visit IBIZA we can meet and have some fun.

  21. dman08

    britney hands down. Lohan looks like she’s drunk in the pic.

Leave a Reply

Comment a lot? Register here. Already registered? Login here.


Want your own gravatar? Get one here.