Scarlett Johansson and Natalie Portman on the Cover of W Magazine

Filed under: Media

scarjonatalie-w.jpg

CUT TO: ONE MINUTE LATER.

Scarlett and Natalie pick up their guitars, while Robert Palmer belts out “You’re gonna have to face it, you’re addicted to love…”


Posted by Candy ♦ February 12, 2008

Leave a Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post

Subscribe without commenting

Comments

13 Responses to “Scarlett Johansson and Natalie Portman on the Cover of W Magazine”

  1. MMB

    I get that Natalie Portman is supposedly smart–she did go to Harvard, though I think it is BS when stars get credit for going to Yale, Harvard, etc…I mean, if they were already famous before they went to college, I am pretty sure it wasn’t SAT’s that got them in. And it’s not like the Jodie Foster college years, when she dropped out of the limelight and stopped making movies to really get an education–these people barely go to class, and still somehow graduate…anyway…

    Scarlett J.? Um, what makes her so brilliant? Because she is not Lohan? I mean, most of these girls barely have high school educations…they had stupid tutors a couple of hours a day on the set of movies. Just because S. Jo runs her mouth about war and politics does NOT make her smart…

  2. ahahaha… proof that they are “smart, sexy, and serious” comes in the form of freezing facial muscles, wearing a — button-down shirt collar, with the shirt cut out? is that what that is?– and cleavage. very subtle.

  3. Julie

    Why is Tinkerbell in the photo? Or is that Bit Bit?

  4. areukiddingme?

    How do men find them sexy? Both have obvious skin problems!!! Yeah that’s attractive!!!!

  5. jenner

    Hmm….I don’t think it was a wise move for Scarlett to pose with Natalie. Just my opinion, but Natalie puts her to SHAME…

  6. martini lover

    natalie is gorgeous, but the dog for the win!

  7. Vern

    I agree jenner-Scarjo looks mannish next to Natalie!

  8. Jo Jo

    They do look like they came from that Robert Palmer (God rest his soul) video.

  9. bv

    Very gorgeous and talented girls. Let’s hope dick, I mean love, is the only thing they ever become addicted to.

  10. lola

    I don’t know. There’s no way for me to say “I’m just not that into either of them” without sounding like a bitch. It’s just a “whatever” feeling, like seeing them on a magazine doesn’t thrill me one way or another. They’re so overly-polished with these adopted personas of old-Hollywood, stylish but boring grooming, and “taste” (meaning only taking scripts with lots of staring and British actors in them) it’s just….blah. And they both seemed to have stagnated in the talent pool: not getting any better, not getting any worse. They’re both very lovely girls and much more tasteful than most, though.

    As for me, give me Keira Knigthley any day. Love her or hate her, she photographs in a striking and provocative way, does very varied performances, and comes off as Eliza Doolittle at the Ascot while still being rather gorgeous and composed.

  11. ^
    What lola said.

    Except Keira is a bit overexposed these days too. My friends made relentless fun of keira’s squeeky voice in the “Atonement” commercials.

  12. martini lover

    keira has one look: constipated.

  13. Pak31

    Don’t understand the fascination with Scarlett.

Leave a Reply

Comment a lot? Register here. Already registered? Login here.


Want your own gravatar? Get one here.