Billy Bush vs. Mary Hart

Filed under: Media

maryhart-billybush.jpg

Access Hollywood’s Billy Bush took time out of his busy schedule of kissing Donald Trump’s ass (seriously, is Donald on that show every night?) to express his disgust with Mary Hart and Entertainment Tonight for almost airing a two-year-old video of Heath Ledger snorting cocaine. ET has since announced they won’t show the video out of “respect for Heath’s family.” Yeah, some respect.

Billy wrote on his Access Hollywood blog (fun parts highlighted):

I don’t often comment on our competition, but because we have so much of it in the “entertainment show” genre these days, we are often lumped in a group together. The fact is, we’re very different, and that stems mostly from the difference in scruples of the respective Executive Producers.

”Entertainment Tonight” and “The Insider” ran a promo tonight for their Heath Ledger drug use video, which they “reportedly” (love that lawyer enforced word) bought for a couple hundred thousand dollars. A still frame of this video which shows Heath apparently doing cocaine ran on the east coast feed of “ET,” but on the west coast feed, the tasteless still shot was replaced with a shot of someone’s feet (Heath’s, I guess). The voice over by Mary Hart had not changed, however. She still spoke of the incriminating scene and still promo’d the full video tomorrow.

Yes, the still shot was just a taste. Tomorrow is Day 1 of the sweeps ratings period.

Gross. Totally gross.

And add to that some predictability:”ET” and “The Insider” higher ups released this tonight:

“Out of respect for HEATH LEDGER’s family, ‘Entertainment Tonight’ and ‘The Insider’ have decided not to run the Heath Ledger video which has been circulating in the world media,”

“Out of respect” — Oh my. How about, “in response to a letter of outrage, written by Heath’s publicist, circulating the industry hotter and faster than nude Brangelina photos could, we have decided to duck and run here.” That would be refreshingly honest.

Here’s an excerpt of that aforementioned letter by Heath’s publicity firm and clearly in defense of those loved ones of Heath’s still reeling from the loss:

”Tonight Entertainment Tonight/The Insider are previewing an extremely distasteful segment regarding Heath Ledger. The segment centers around a two-year old video ET purchased for a large sum of money in the hopes of stirring up a salacious and exploitive story about Heath, which would win them big ratings on the first day of sweeps. The two outlets did not even have the courtesy to wait until after Heath’s burial to broadcast this segment. They intend to air the full segment tomorrow.”

For the sake of his grieving family and friends, his child, and common decency, we hope to pressure “Entertainment Tonight” and “The Insider” to do the right thing and pull the spot. This is not journalism, it is sensationalism. It is a shameful exploitation of the lowest kind, to a talented and gentle soul, undeserving of such treatment.

Wow. I don’t always leap to the side of publicists, because objectivity is sometimes an afterthought. They are hired to shape an image, but –

Heath Ledger’s family has not even had the chance to bury their son. We know he had problems, but this kind of salacious opportunism is poisonous.

I struggle with every type of borderline exploitive material. I’m a constant pain to our Executive Producer as I worry too much that things go too far. Ask him.

I am shocked that Mary Hart would read this crap. I know her and she is a very nice lady, but its clear to me she’s “checked out” of that place, basically taking whatever they put in her hand and reading it with the same excitable veneer you’d expect to hear at a 50’s sock hop.

Mary gets paid a lot of money. She must have the clout to say ‘no.’ Their Executive producer used to run “Hard Copy.” She doesn’t hit the brakes for anything. But Mary, you are the June Cleaver of entertainment news; this cannot be OK.

Let’s see how long the outrage lasts.

Oh, Billy. While I agree with you one-hundred percent (well, 99%… nothing would circulate faster than nude Brangelina photos), I wouldn’t recommend walking in any dark alleys in the upcoming months. Mary Hart could snap you like a twig! Be wary of the ones who smile too much, I always say.  Yeah, that goes for you, too, Rachael Ray.


Posted by Candy ♦ January 31, 2008

Leave a Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post

Subscribe without commenting

Comments

4 Responses to “Billy Bush vs. Mary Hart”

  1. Zip

    Billy’s right!!!

  2. scamps

    I thought the image was just of some guy at the same party as Heath.

  3. Mary Hart should do a story on the skeletons in Dr. Phil’s closet. he’s self-righteous as hell, and no one wants to see Heath’s name dragged through the mud.

  4. Exyank

    The video doesn’t actually show Heath Ledger using drugs. At all. He does say that he used to smoke “five joints a day for twenty years”, which would mean he was saying he started smoking five joints a day at the age of five or so. He then goes on to say that this is the reason he had the M tattooed on his arm. It was for Matilda, to remind him never to smoke a joint again.

    The “five joints a day for twenty years” sounds to me like that which Australians call a “yarn”, or which might be known as a “tall tale” or something you say with tremendous exaggeration for the sake of testing how gullible your listeners.

    There were drugs in the video. Heath did not partake. He just sat and talked. And made wild claims about how much marijuana he used to smoke.

    I’m not saying he did or didn’t have any sort of problems with recreational drugs, but the reports that the video shows him doing drugs are incorrect.

Leave a Reply

Comment a lot? Register here. Already registered? Login here.


Want your own gravatar? Get one here.