Filed under: Fame - Ain't It a Bitch
Whenever I’m having a high self-esteem day, I make sure to check out Daily Mail to remind myself that I should never accept my “unsightly” imperfections.
Thanks for that slice of humble pie, Daily Mail!
Posted by Candy ♦ December 4, 2007
At 10:12 am big joe said:
i say, what a bunch of prats these guys are. she looks absolutely great. i can’t believe these cads. they are daft. the ironic thing is (to be horribly general) most british men have terrible bodies from eating all that yorkshire pudding.
December 4, 2007
At 10:13 am princess bride said:
they’re a bunch of arses. it also looks photoshopped??
December 4, 2007
At 10:28 am Happy Go Lucky said:
Cindy is fabulous
December 4, 2007
At 10:30 am Michelle said:
Whatever, it may not even be her.
“Unsightly signs of motherhood”?!
Hey, if a few strechmarks are the payback for being one of the worlds top paid super models in her prime, so be it, I’ll take it!
December 4, 2007
At 10:40 am Bee Hind said:
She looks great.
I’ve seen photos of her children,
and they are beautiful-
definitely worth a few stretch marks.
Can’t these guys think of something more constructive to write about- like why British people have such lousy teeth?
December 4, 2007
At 11:26 am Javelin said:
She looks fabulous and fun.
December 4, 2007
At 12:36 pm kathleen said:
this picture is bad photoshop. here is cindy in her bikini: http://www.dotspotter.com/news/486225_Cindy_Crawford_Bikini_Photos_In_Hawaii
December 4, 2007
At 1:03 pm stell said:
Now, is that her or not?
December 4, 2007
At 1:08 pm Hannah said:
I’ve seen alot of recent pictures of Cindy in her bikini and there’s NO WAY that’s her stomach. Even if it was, who cares??? I could only WISH to look that gorgeous!!!
December 4, 2007
At 1:15 pm kathleen said:
it’s NOT her stomach. it’s totally photoshopped. she’s been in hawaii with her husband, and there have been tons of her bikini pictures all over the internet lately - that is NOT her stomach.
December 4, 2007
At 1:31 pm Candy said:
My friend and Photoshop whiz, 14, informs me that they likely took the sunlight dappling her flesh and ran it through a Photoshop filter called “posterize” to add contrast to the selected areas, thus making it stand out more. They do the same to accentuate veins on hands, etc.
Photoshop: Not always a celebrity’s friend.
December 4, 2007
At 1:48 pm 14 said:
it’s true. Depending on the time of day, sunlight can fall upon the skin in such a way as to enhance even the slightest bit of cellulite or lose flesh. Just check out some of those “worst beach body” photos from Star magazine. In Cindy’s case, the photo editors over at Daily NAIL seemed to have enhanced the image using a contrast filter, thus making a bad picture/angle even worse.
December 4, 2007
At 2:57 pm Sara said:
I saw those pictures a few days ago and I don’t think her stomach looked like that. Either somebody airbrushed the stretch marks out or they airbrushed them in.
December 4, 2007
At 3:22 pm Holy Terror said:
Every time, I mean every time a magazine runs one of these “Look how ugly/fat/old” they are articles, we should post photos of the publishers and editors alongside the story.
December 4, 2007
At 5:57 pm bluehawaii said:
Rear view, too.
December 4, 2007
At 5:05 pm Pak31 said:
You guys are all awesome. I love all your posts and I am actually impressed that you all are smart enough to see the truth in these pics instead of ripping her apart like other blogs have done. I felt that these were doctored when I saw them, I really doubt that someone who has worked out her entire life would have a stomach like that at her age. Especially when the rest of her still looks fairly toned, then her tummy is all out of whack?? No way, THe pics that someone posted here of her w/o flab are probably touched up a bit and the flab pic was enhanced to look bad. I think people forget that you can’t believe anything you see on the internet.
December 7, 2007