Filed under: Beauty
… then this should be back-ordered till the sun fizzles out.
Behold the ad for former Gucci designer Tom Ford’s new fragrance (for which Vanessa Minnillo and Vanessa Hudgens clearly did not model). It’s no surprise that a gay man would suggest women put perfume on their va-jay-jay.
Posted by Candy ♦ September 13, 2007
At 6:23 pm tinkywinky said:
i’d like to get the # of her waxer.
September 13, 2007
At 9:16 pm MsTriste said:
yuck.
September 13, 2007
At 3:39 am Zip said:
Coochie already has a wonderful scent, who needs perfume to cover it up???
September 14, 2007
At 4:59 am margaretta said:
Now that’s just tacky, eau de vayjay
September 14, 2007
At 5:49 am kathleen said:
and it’s an ad for his men’s cologne, isn’t it?
September 14, 2007
At 7:25 am Me said:
Does it smell like
expensive fish??
September 14, 2007
At 9:48 am Fabiola Thing said:
Yeah, um, I found that ad very disturbing.
September 14, 2007
At 12:27 am Tom Ford said:
Let’s see it from the other side. Would it sell when there is a naked lady from 85 with a bottle between her legs or breasts?
If it was a naked man like the model Chris Evans, no women was complaining.
September 15, 2007
At 11:24 am Me said:
“From the other side…..?”
Especially since the eau de-
whatever has
nothing to do with genitalia?
Even if it was a hot naked
man modeling it while he is
massaging my feet, this doesn’t
help me want to buy it.
Must not be a very good
product if it needs to be
marketed in this fashion.
September 15, 2007
At 2:28 am Gucci said:
I wonder what handbags are of better quality - Gucci or Fendi? What’s your opinion?
December 9, 2007